Automotive Quality & Process

ASPICE Gap Analysis & Audit Readiness

I help automotive suppliers get ready for ASPICE assessments before the OEM auditor shows up: gap analysis, process improvement, and audit readiness.

Provisional ASPICE Assessor (intacs certified) · 8 years in automotive quality · OEM-level assessment experience with major German manufacturers
Services

Three ways to work together

Clear deliverables, no guesswork. Pick what matches where you are before your next assessment.

01

Gap Analysis

A structured look at where your processes stand against ASPICE requirements. Fixed scope, fixed price. Typically 3–5 days, ending with a clear report of what needs to change before an assessor sees it.

Fixed scope · Fixed price
02

Preparation Program

Multi-month, milestone-based support for teams with real gaps to close before a scheduled assessment. Practical process work, not documentation for its own sake.

Defined milestones
03

Retained Advisory

Ongoing support for teams that want a second set of eyes on process decisions as they scale. Fixed monthly price, not billed by the hour. Paying for outcomes delivered, not hours logged.

Fixed monthly price
About

Who's doing the work

DN

Eight years in automotive quality, spanning production and R&D, hardware and software, inside both a large OEM supplier and a startup. Provisional ASPICE assessor (intacs certified), with OEM-level assessment experience at major German manufacturers, means I know exactly what assessors are looking for and where suppliers usually get caught out.

I work with scale-ups facing their first OEM audit or racing to hit CL2. Remote-first, with on-site visits wherever the work needs it.

Quality should empower teams, not slow them down. It's a tool, not the goal.

Dalma Nedeliczki Provisional ASPICE Assessor (intacs certified)
Case Studies

How an engagement plays out

A look at how one engagement played out, from the process problem to the measured result.

Compliance Review Redesign

Situation

A global Tier 1 automotive supplier's R&D department ran ~20 projects against one rigid, global compliance checklist. Quarterly reviews took weeks of manual, subjective work.

Action

Using DMAIC methodology, I mapped the full development lifecycle and redesigned the review framework around risk-based tailoring, so each project was assessed against its actual context instead of a generic standard.

Result

Review effort cut by ~75%, saving roughly €45,000 a year in engineering time across 5 projects. It held up even as the team turned over, because the fix lived in the framework, not in any one person.

Ready to know where you stand?

Book your slot so you know exactly where the gaps are before anyone official walks in.

Book a call